The conflict between Apple and Samsung over patents and copyrights
Keywords:Samsung, Apple, Intellectual Property, Copyright, Patent, Conflict.
This article seeks to explore the conflict between Samsung and Apple. The conflict has been one of the most outstanding patent wars in the history of the smartphone industry. Apple and Samsung are among the most popular manufacturers of commonly used smartphones and tablets. The conflict began when Apple decided to file a federal lawsuit in the US district court, accusing Samsung of copying some of its iPhone features in the Samsung Galaxy S II smartphone. The court ascertained that the gadget had similar characteristics to Apple, thus ordering Samsung to pay Apple for the damages. In response, Samsung reacted by filing countersuits. The two firms, almost fifty cases in different nations and regions. The issues lasted for seven years, starting from 2011 and ending in 2016, in which both companies benefited and lost at the same time. The conflict emanated because of each firm pursuing its competitive advantage in the market. Apart from following market shares, third parties, like consumers, instigated the conflict, with international politics and the media playing a role.
Burnick, S. (2017). The importance of the design patent to modern-day technology: The Supreme Court’s decision to narrow the damages clause in Samsung v. Apple. North Carolina Journal of Law & Technology, 18(5), 283.
Cardoso, E., 2017. Examining the differences of the internationalization strategies of two of the major brands in the smartphone industry-Apple inc. versus Samsung electronics. Ph.D. diss., 1(1), 1-15.
Coughlin, T. (2016). Apple, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co.: Economics of design patent trolling. Cardozo Arts & Ent. LJ, 35, 209.
Dordick, S. B. (2015). Lay Jurors: The true casualties of the Apple v. Samsung smartphone patent Wars. Temp. Int'l & Comp. LJ, 29, 239.
Gil, E. M. (2016). Samsung v. Apple: Taking a bite out of the design patent article of manufacture controversy. U. Miami Bus. L. Rev., 25, 67.
Han, Y. W., 2016. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al. v Apple Inc. 137 S. Ct. 429 (Dec. 6, 2016)-Overview of the design patent lawsuit between Samsung & Apple. Northeast Asian Law Review.
Jie, C. T., & Hasan, N. A. M. (2017). Apple Versus Samsung patent lawsuit: An issue and crisis management approach. International Journal, 2(5), 1-12.
Kang, T. (2018). Samsung v. Apple: The ill-fated introduction of apportionment-by-component for designs. Berkeley Tech. LJ, 33, 889.
Kim, J. Y. (2016). Message strategies in smartphone patent battles. Journal of Communication Management, 20(3), 255-267.
Kim, P., 2018. Integration of Management and Culture: The Culture of Dedication in Samsung Electronics and Apple Inc. PhD diss., ????? ???, 1(1), 1-15.
Lee, W. S., Lee, M. K., Kang, S., & Yoo, J. W. (2019). The Samsung–Apple patent war: Socio-cultural comparative study of news frames in a business conflict issue. International Communication Gazette, 81(1), 46-65.
Lord, S. M., Przestrzelsk, B. & Reddy, E., 2018. Teaching Social Responsibility: Conflict Minerals Module for a Circuits Class. In 2018 World Engineering Education Forum-Global Engineering Deans Council (WEEF-GEDC, 1(1), 1-6.
Park, B. J., & Kim, D. (2020). Coopetition dynamics between giant entrants and incumbents in a new convergent segment: a case in the smartphone industry. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 6(1), 1-22.
Samuelson, P. (2016). Apple v. Samsung and the upcoming design patent wars. Communications of the ACM, 59(7), 22-24.
Sim, S., 2017. A Comparative Study of Trade Dress in the US and South Korea: Rethinking on the Laws and Precedents in the Apple v. Samsung. 1(1), 1-15.
Yun, B. S., Lee, S. G., & Aoshima, Y. (2019). An analysis of the trilemma phenomenon for Apple iPhone and Samsung Galaxy. Service Business, 13(4), 779-812.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2020 Hani Albasoos, Nabil Al Musallami
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Bussecon Review of Social Sciences by Bussecon International Academy is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.