Marketing and strategic challenges with commercializing acceleration of Small-Growers Enterprises
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36096/ijbes.v7i4.826Keywords:
Marketing Mix, Resources Optimization, Channels, Promotion, Segmenting, PositioningAbstract
The adoption of plausible strategic marketing deliverables within the sustainable agricultural ecosystem remains a challenge for small-scale growers due to scarce resources and constraint capabilities. The prospects of expediting access to markets and points of sale, which properly established and capacitated enterprises dominate, contain the ability for small-scale growers to commercialise their hard-earned crops and produce. This study unpacks the strategic marketing techniques and tools that small-scale growers could utilize to mitigate their active participation in the complex agricultural business ecosystem. The body of literature explicated various considerations that could be integrated into an attempt to demystify the common challenges and constraints that conform the small growers from the marking mix context and perspective. A positivism-oriented philosophy of the quantitative methodology was utilized in the study to solicit the description of the variables that constitute the elucidation of the strategic phenomenon in the study. The findings revealed that various marketing tools could provide constructive and beneficial advantages for small growers if applied efficaciously and correctly. The findings further indicated that packaging the marketing mixes intervention such as channels, segmenting positioning, channel, target market, and promotion could accelerate the small growers' attainment of sustainable competitive advantage within the broader scope of commercializing their enterprises.
Downloads
References
Barney, J. B. (2018). Why resource-based theory’s model of profit appropriation must incorporate a stakeholder perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 39(12), 3305–3329. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2949 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2949
Bauman, A., McFadden, D. T., & Jablonski, B. B. (2018). The financial performance implications of differential marketing strategies: Exploring farms that pursue local markets as a core competitive advantage. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 47(3), 477–504. https://doi.org/10.1017/age.2017.34 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/age.2017.34
Berman, S. L., Down, J. T., & Hill, C. W. L. (2002). Tacit knowledge as a competitive advantage in the National Basketball Association. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 13–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3069282
Berti, G., & Mulligan, C. (2016). Competitiveness of small farms and innovative food supply chains: The role of food hubs in creating sustainable regional and local food systems. Sustainability, 8(7), 616. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8070616 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su8070616
Cele, L., Chang, Y. C., Wei, M. F., & Luh, Y. H. (2021). Choice of modern food distribution channels and its welfare effects: Empirical evidence from Taiwan. Agriculture, 11(6), 499. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11060499 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11060499
Charan, J., Kaur, R., Bhardwaj, P., Singh, K., Ambwani, S. R., & Misra, S. (2021). Sample size calculation in medical research: A primer. Annals of the National Academy of Medical Sciences (India), 57(2), 74–80. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1722104 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1722104
Choudhury, P., Foroughi, C., & Larson, B. (2020). Work-from-anywhere: The productivity effects of geographic flexibility. Strategic Management Journal. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3251 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2020.225
Cofré-Bravo, G., Klerkx, L., & Engler, A. (2019). Combinations of bonding, bridging, and linking social capital for farm innovation: How farmers configure different support networks. Journal of Rural Studies, 69, 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.04.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.04.004
Cooper, D. J., Ezzamel, M., & Qu, S. Q. (2017). Popularizing a management accounting idea: The case of the balanced scorecard. Contemporary Accounting Research, 34(2), 991–1025. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12299 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12299
Cornejo-Velazquez, E., Clavel-Maqueda, M., Acevedo-Sandoval, O. A., & Romero-Trejo, H. (2022). Technological innovation strategy to strengthen the competitive advantages of smallholder farmers. In Innovation in small-farm agriculture (pp. 23–31). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003164968-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003164968-4
Davari Farid, R., Azizi, J., Allahyari, M. S., Damalas, C. A., & Sadeghpour, H. (2019). Marketing mix for the promotion of biological control among small-scale paddy farmers. International Journal of Pest Management, 65(1), 59–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/09670874.2018.1459927 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09670874.2018.1459927
Devaux, A., Torero, M., Donovan, J., & Horton, D. (2018). Agricultural innovation and inclusive value-chain development: A review. Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies, 8(1), 99–123. https://doi.org/10.1108/JADEE-06-2017-0065 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JADEE-06-2017-0065
Dimitri, C., & Gardner, K. (2019). Farmer use of intermediated market channels: A review. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 34(3), 181–197. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742170518000182 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742170518000182
Etriya, E., Scholten, V. E., Wubben, E. F., Kemp, R. G., & Omta, S. O. (2018). The importance of innovation adoption and generation in linking entrepreneurial orientation with product innovation and farm revenues: The case of vegetable farmers in West Java, Indonesia. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 21(7), 969–988. https://doi.org/10.22434/IFAMR2017.0038 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22434/IFAMR2017.0038
Fa?kowski, J., & Chlebicka, A. (2021). What product mix do they offer, and what marketing channels do they use? – Exploring agricultural producer organisations’ heterogeneity. Journal of Rural Studies, 85, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.05.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.05.002
Flores, H., Villalobos, J. R., Ahumada, O., Uchanski, M., Meneses, C., & Sanchez, O. (2019). Use of supply chain planning tools for efficiently placing small farmers into high-value vegetable markets. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 157, 205–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2018.12.050 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2018.12.050
Freeman, R. E., Dmytriyev, S. D., & Phillips, R. A. (2021). Stakeholder theory and the resource-based view of the firm. Journal of Management, 47(7), 1757–1770. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206321993576 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206321993576
Garamszegi, L. Z. (2016). A simple statistical guide for the analysis of behaviour when data are constrained due to practical or ethical reasons. Animal Behaviour, 120, 223–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.11.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.11.009
Hossain, M. U., & Al Asheq, A. (2019). The role of entrepreneurial orientation to SME performance in Bangladesh. International Journal of Entrepreneurship, 23(1), 1–6. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331979536
Iza, C. L., & Dentoni, D. (2020). How entrepreneurial orientation drives farmers' innovation differential in Ugandan coffee multi-stakeholder platforms. Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies, 10(5), 629–650. https://doi.org/10.1108/JADEE-01-2020-0007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JADEE-01-2020-0007
Kebenei, M., Mwangi, E., & Mathenge, P. (2021). Agripreneur sustainability strategies and financial performance of small-scale farmers in Uasin-Gishu County, Kenya. European Journal of Business and Strategic Management, 6(1), 30–55. https://doi.org/10.47604/ejbsm.1321 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47604/ejbsm.1321
Kilelu, C., Klerkx, L., Omore, A., Baltenweck, I., Leeuwis, C., & Githinji, J. (2017). Value chain upgrading and the inclusion of smallholders in markets: Reflections on contributions of multi-stakeholder processes in dairy development in Tanzania. The European Journal of Development Research, 29, 1102–1121. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-016-0074-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-016-0074-z
Krishnan, R., Yen, P., Agarwal, R., Arshinder, K., & Bajada, C. (2021). Collaborative innovation and sustainability in the food supply chain: Evidence from farmer producer organisations. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 168, 105253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105253 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105253
Lee, B., Liu, J. Y., & Chang, H. H. (2020). The choice of marketing channel and farm profitability: Empirical evidence from small farmers. Agribusiness, 36(3), 402–421. https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.21640 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.21640
McGahan, A. M. (2021). Integrating insights from the resource-based view of the firm into the new stakeholder theory. Journal of Management, 47(7), 1734–1756. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206321993576 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320987282
Nalubowa, W., Moruzzo, R., Scarpellini, P., & Granai, G. (2024). The potential of farmers’ markets: The Uganda case. Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies. https://doi.org/10.1108/JADEE-06-2023-0160 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JADEE-06-2023-0160
Ndlovu, C., & Masuku, M. (2021). Small-scale farming and access to market: Challenges and opportunities in South Africa. Journal La Sociale, 2(5), 50–63. https://doi.org/10.37899/journal-la-sociale.v2i5.491 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37899/journal-la-sociale.v2i5.491
Ndlovu, P. N., Thamaga-Chitja, J. M., & Ojo, T. O. (2021). Factors influencing the level of vegetable value chain participation and implications on smallholder farmers in Swayimane, KwaZulu-Natal. Land Use Policy, 109, 105611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105611 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105611
Niemelä, P. T., & Dingemanse, N. J. (2018). On the usage of single measurements in behavioural ecology research on individual differences. Animal Behaviour, 145, 99–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2018.09.012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2018.09.012
Nybom, J. (2023). Quantifying internal and external influences on Swedish farmers’ strategic choices and performance outcomes (No. 2023: 52). https://doi.org/10.54612/a.3ll97ltqev DOI: https://doi.org/10.54612/a.3ll97ltqev
Pandey, D. K., & Mishra, R. (2024). Towards sustainable agriculture: Harnessing AI for global food security. Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aiia.2024.04.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aiia.2024.04.003
Rahi, S. (2017). Research design and methods: A systematic review of research paradigms, sampling issues and instruments development. International Journal of Economics & Management Sciences, 6(2), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.4172/2162-6359.1000403 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4172/2162-6359.1000403
Rusu, V. D., Roman, A., Tudose, M. B., & Cojocaru, O. M. (2022). An empirical investigation of the link between entrepreneurship performance and economic development: The case of EU countries. Applied Sciences, 12(14), 6867. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12146867 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app12146867
Wale, E. (2020). Determinants of smallholders’ entrepreneurial drive, willingness and ability to expand farming operations in KwaZulu-Natal. Development in Practice, 30(8), 1028–1042. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614524.2020.1764501 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09614524.2020.1764501
Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource?based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250050207
Yuwei, L. (2024). Market positioning & operational strategy to start home goods retail business in Indonesia. Devotion: Journal of Research & Community Service, 5(12). https://doi.org/10.59188/devotion.v5i12.25390 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59188/devotion.v5i12.25390
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Charles Tony Simphiwe Ngwenya

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© 2025 retained by the authors. Licensee BSC International Academy, Istanbul, Turkey. This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).